|
In the third Quarter of 2011, we received the engineering and flight models (EMs and FMs) of the sun sensors for the small satellite Flying Laptop. The team's gratitute goes to Azur Space for sponsoring the GaAs-cells; to Qioptiq for the donation of the cover glasses for the solar cells and to the people of Astrium Ottobrunn, who kindly assembled the sun sensors.
The incoming inspection, at which the delivered parts are checked for transportation damage and other defects, was also cunducted succesfully.
 
As mentioned above, the core element of the sun sensors of the Flying Laptop are GaAs solar cells. The cells produce a current which is directly correlated to the power of the beam of light. The point of operation of the cells is defined by using two, in parallel load resistors. By applying Ohm's law and measuring the voltage drop across the well-known resistors it is possible to calculate the current of the solar cells. This measurement is done by the satellite's power control and distribution unit (PCDU). Subsequently, the information is routed to the on-board computer (OBC), where it is correlated to determine the direction of the sun relative to the satellite.
However, the correlation between the obtained measurements and the sun direction is more complex. This is because solar cells do not distiguish between different light sources. Additionally, under certain conditions the Earth reflects up to one-third of the sun's light power. Therefore, it is difficult to assess wether the sun sensor measures the light from the sun at an acute angle, or "sees" the reflected light from the earth directly.
 
Due to this signal distoration and for defining the accuracy of the Sun Sensor system a characterization of the cells has to be done. First, this includes a set-up for measuring the behavior of the solar cells at different temperatures. Due to the large temperature differences in space the open-circuit voltage varies greatly. This effect is problematic if the point of operation defined by the load resistors slips behind the maximum power point (the last point on the right side of the graph, before the current drops rapidly; compare last figure). Then, the correlation is not only dependent on the angle of incident but also on the temperature and becomes ambiguous.
Second, an experiemental measurement of the angles of incident, using a calibrated light source, is necessary. This shall verify that the correlation is mainly subject to the cosine law and that unknown effects at small angles (e.g. refraction in the cover glass, scattered light, ...) are negligible. Our thanks goes to the people of the Institute of Photovoltaik of the University of Stuttgart, who allowed us to use their solar simulator for the characterization
 
|